Investing
Conservative Starbucks investor loses diversity challenge
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A Starbucks logo is pictured on the door of the Green Apron Delivery Service at the Empire State Building in the Manhattan borough of New York, U.S. June 1, 2016. REUTERS/Carlo Allegri/File Photo
By Jody Godoy
(Reuters) -A U.S. judge on Friday dismissed a conservative activist investor’s lawsuit against Starbucks (NASDAQ:)’ board, opposing the company’s diversity, equity and inclusion policies and calling it frivolous.
The National Center for Public Policy Research (NCPPR) sued in August 2022 over Starbucks’ setting hiring goals for Blacks and other people of color, awarding contracts to “diverse” suppliers and advertisers, and tying executive pay to diversity.
The nonprofit, which holds around $6,000 in Starbucks stock, said those policies require the company to make race-baced decisions that violate federal and state civil rights laws.
Chief U.S. District Judge Stanley Bastian in Spokane, Washington, rejected the allegations at a hearing in the case on Friday, saying the lawsuit centered on public policy questions that are for lawmakers and corporations, not courts, to decide.
“If the plaintiff doesn’t want to be invested in woke corporate America, perhaps it should seek other investment opportunities rather than wasting this court’s time,” he said.
The lawsuit is similar to those recently by conservative activist groups opposing corporate diversity and inclusion efforts in the wake of a June Supreme Court ruling.
The ruling declared unlawful the race-conscious student admissions policies used by Harvard University and the University of North Carolina.
On Friday, Daniel Morenoff of The American Civil Rights Project argued that Starbucks policies seeking to increase racial diversity among its suppliers, vendors, and employees were discriminatory and that NCPPR’s cause was in the corporate interest.
Bastian rejected that argument, saying the group’s complaint did not represent the interests of Starbucks shareholders and failed to follow required legal procedure.
NCPPR may not refile its complaint, and Starbucks may seek legal fees, he said.
The case is Craig v. Target Corp. (NYSE:) et al., No. 23-00599, U.S. District Court, Middle District Of Florida.
Read the full article here
-
Side Hustles4 days ago
Why the Best CEOs Think Like Anthropologists
-
Make Money5 days ago
Earn More in 2025: Top 10 High-Yield Savings Accounts Revealed
-
Passive Income5 days ago
How Pets Can Promote Better Health and Well-Being in the Workplace
-
Side Hustles5 days ago
10 Roles That Are Surprisingly Well-Suited for Outsourcing
-
Side Hustles5 days ago
What to Do If TikTok is Banned — How to Protect Your Brand
-
Make Money6 days ago
Build Your Future: 5 Simple Steps to Financial Stability
-
Side Hustles6 days ago
Meta Is Laying Off 5% of Its Workforce: Read the Memo
-
Investing2 days ago
TikTok faces US ban deadline as users brace for fallout By Reuters