Investing
Conservative Starbucks investor loses diversity challenge
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A Starbucks logo is pictured on the door of the Green Apron Delivery Service at the Empire State Building in the Manhattan borough of New York, U.S. June 1, 2016. REUTERS/Carlo Allegri/File Photo
By Jody Godoy
(Reuters) -A U.S. judge on Friday dismissed a conservative activist investor’s lawsuit against Starbucks (NASDAQ:)’ board, opposing the company’s diversity, equity and inclusion policies and calling it frivolous.
The National Center for Public Policy Research (NCPPR) sued in August 2022 over Starbucks’ setting hiring goals for Blacks and other people of color, awarding contracts to “diverse” suppliers and advertisers, and tying executive pay to diversity.
The nonprofit, which holds around $6,000 in Starbucks stock, said those policies require the company to make race-baced decisions that violate federal and state civil rights laws.
Chief U.S. District Judge Stanley Bastian in Spokane, Washington, rejected the allegations at a hearing in the case on Friday, saying the lawsuit centered on public policy questions that are for lawmakers and corporations, not courts, to decide.
“If the plaintiff doesn’t want to be invested in woke corporate America, perhaps it should seek other investment opportunities rather than wasting this court’s time,” he said.
The lawsuit is similar to those recently by conservative activist groups opposing corporate diversity and inclusion efforts in the wake of a June Supreme Court ruling.
The ruling declared unlawful the race-conscious student admissions policies used by Harvard University and the University of North Carolina.
On Friday, Daniel Morenoff of The American Civil Rights Project argued that Starbucks policies seeking to increase racial diversity among its suppliers, vendors, and employees were discriminatory and that NCPPR’s cause was in the corporate interest.
Bastian rejected that argument, saying the group’s complaint did not represent the interests of Starbucks shareholders and failed to follow required legal procedure.
NCPPR may not refile its complaint, and Starbucks may seek legal fees, he said.
The case is Craig v. Target Corp. (NYSE:) et al., No. 23-00599, U.S. District Court, Middle District Of Florida.
Read the full article here
-
Investing5 days ago
This All-Access Pass to Learning Is Now $20 for Black Friday
-
Passive Income5 days ago
How to Create a Routine That Balances Rest and Business Success
-
Side Hustles6 days ago
Apple Prepares a New AI-Powered Siri to Compete With ChatGPT
-
Side Hustles3 days ago
A Macy’s Employee Made Accounting Errors Worth $132 Million
-
Investing2 days ago
Factbox-How Trump can overhaul US financial regulators when he takes office By Reuters
-
Passive Income6 days ago
Customers Want More Than Just a Product — Here’s How to Keep Up
-
Side Hustles7 days ago
MIT Gives Free Tuition For Families Earning $200,000 or Less
-
Side Hustles5 days ago
Gift the Power of Language Learning with This Limited-Time Price on Babbel