Investing
Elon Musk documents subpoenaed in Jeffrey Epstein lawsuit by U.S. Virgin Islands
![](https://personalfinancedefined.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/LYNXMPED202O6_L.jpg)
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Tesla CEO Elon Musk departs the company’s local office in Washington, U.S. January 27, 2023. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
By Tom Hals
WILMINGTON, Delaware (Reuters) -The U.S. Virgin Islands has subpoenaed Tesla (NASDAQ:) Inc CEO Elon Musk for documents in its lawsuit accusing JPMorgan Chase & Co (NYSE:) of helping enable sexual abuses by late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
The subpoena, issued on April 28, came to light on Monday in a request by the Virgin Islands to serve Musk by alternative means because it had been unable to locate and serve him.
The U.S. territory did not seek to question Musk under oath, and its effort to subpoena him does not implicate him in any wrong doing.
According to the Monday court filing in U.S. District Court in Manhattan, Musk, one of the richest people in the world, may have been referred to JPMorgan by Epstein. The Virgin Islands did not provide further explanation for its interest in obtaining documents from Musk.
Musk did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Epstein died by suicide in 2019 in a Manhattan jail cell while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges.
The U.S. Virgin Islands accuses JPMorgan of missing red flags about Epstein’s abuse of women on Little St. James, a private island he owned there.
The bank has denied knowledge of Epstein’s crimes.
In the subpoena, the Virgin Islands demanded any documents Musk has about Epstein’s involvement in human trafficking and his procurement of girls or women for commercial sex.
Additionally, the subpoena sought any communications between the entrepreneur and JPMorgan about Epstein as well as between Musk and Epstein. Documents regarding fees paid by Musk to Epstein or JPMorgan also fall under the subpoena.
HISTORY WITH BANK
The extent of any relationship between Musk and Epstein was unclear. Musk and Tesla vehemently denied speculation in 2019 that Epstein was advising Musk after the Tesla chief ran into trouble with regulators for saying he had lined up the funding to take Tesla private, the New York Times reported.
“It is incorrect to say that Epstein ever advised Elon on anything,” a spokeswoman for Musk told the New York Times at the time.
Musk is the second tech entrepreneur touched by the Virgin Islands litigation. U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff said earlier this month the territory may serve legal papers on Larry Page, although his ruling did not specify the information sought from the co-founder of Google, which is owned by Alphabet (NASDAQ:) Inc.
In a Tesla shareholder lawsuit, Musk testified in January that JPMorgan used to have all of Tesla’s commercial banking business, but the relationship soured after the bank did not support Tesla’s automotive leasing line.
That trial stemmed from Tesla shareholder claims that a 2018 tweet by Musk stating he had “funding secured” to take the carmaker private had misled investors and caused them billions of dollars in damages. The jury found Musk was not liable.
In 2021, JPMorgan sued Tesla for $162 million over the “funding secured” tweet, alleging it caused the repricing of Tesla stock warrants. Tesla countersued the bank last year, accusing it of seeking a windfall.
Read the full article here
![](https://personalfinancedefined.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/pf-logo.png)
-
Personal Finance5 days ago
Americans reveal their biggest financial regret about potential retirement
-
Investing6 days ago
Israel stocks lower at close of trade; TA 35 down 0.88% By Investing.com
-
Side Hustles6 days ago
5 Key Strategies for Attracting and Retaining Top Talent
-
Passive Income4 days ago
5 Ways to Push Past Your Comfort Zone
-
Make Money6 days ago
A Labor Day Salute to You — the American Worker
-
Personal Finance6 days ago
Fed interest rate cuts won't help your credit card debt
-
Passive Income6 days ago
Work Smarter with 12 Months of Microsoft 365 for Just $45
-
Side Hustles5 days ago
Don’t Wait to Fire That Toxic Client — It’s Vital For Your Business Health