Investing
New York lawyers sanctioned for using fake ChatGPT cases in legal brief
© Reuters. A response by ChatGPT, an AI chatbot developed by OpenAI, is seen on its website in this illustration picture taken February 9, 2023. REUTERS/Florence Lo/Illustration
By Sara Merken
NEW YORK (Reuters) – A U.S. judge on Thursday imposed sanctions on two New York lawyers who submitted a legal brief that included six fictitious case citations generated by an artificial intelligence chatbot, ChatGPT.
U.S. District Judge P. Kevin Castel in Manhattan ordered lawyers Steven Schwartz, Peter LoDuca and their law firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman to pay a $5,000 fine in total.
The judge found the lawyers acted in bad faith and made “acts of conscious avoidance and false and misleading statements to the court.”
Levidow, Levidow & Oberman said in a statement on Thursday that its lawyers “respectfully” disagreed with the court that they acted in bad faith.
“We made a good faith mistake in failing to believe that a piece of technology could be making up cases out of whole cloth,” the firm’s statement said.
Lawyers for Schwartz said he declined to comment. LoDuca did not immediately reply to a request for comment, and his lawyer said they are reviewing the decision.
Schwartz admitted in May that he had used ChatGPT to help research the brief in a client’s personal injury case against Colombian airline Avianca and unknowingly included the false citations. LoDuca’s name was the only one on the brief that Schwartz prepared.
Lawyers for Avianca first alerted the court in March that they could not locate some cases cited in the brief.
Bart Banino, a lawyer for Avianca, said on Thursday that irrespective of the lawyers’ use of ChatGPT, the court reached the “right conclusion” by dismissing the personal injury case. The judge in a separate order granted Avianca’s motion to dismiss the case because it was filed too late.
The judge wrote in Thursday’s sanctions order that there is nothing “inherently improper” in lawyers using AI “for assistance,” but he said lawyer ethics rules “impose a gatekeeping role on attorneys to ensure the accuracy of their filings.”
The judge also said that the lawyers “continued to stand by the fake opinions” after the court and the airline questioned whether they existed. His order also said the lawyers must notify the judges, all of them real, who were identified as authors of the fake cases of the sanction.
Read the full article here
-
Side Hustles6 days ago
Mark Zuckerberg Is Now Second Richest Person in the World
-
Investing6 days ago
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang: Demand For Blackwell AI Is Insane
-
Side Hustles7 days ago
How to Be Unapologetically You and Why It Matters
-
Side Hustles7 days ago
With AI Magicx, It’s Like Getting an Entire Creative Team in One Money-Saving AI Tool
-
Side Hustles6 days ago
Meta Previews Movie Gen, AI Tools That Turn Dreams to Videos
-
Investing4 days ago
Hurricane Helene Hits Spruce Pine Mine, Quartz Used for Tech
-
Passive Income7 days ago
How AI-Driven Personalization Is Transforming the Retail Industry
-
Investing6 days ago
BCA says investors should fade the real estate rally By Investing.com