Investing
Robinhood defeats investors’ appeal over meme stock frenzy
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The logo of Robinhood Markets, Inc. is seen at a pop-up event on Wall Street after the company’s IPO in New York City, U.S., July 29, 2021. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo
By Jonathan Stempel
(Reuters) – Robinhood (NASDAQ:) Markets on Thursday defeated an appeal by investors over the stock trading platform’s decision to restrict purchases of 13 “meme stocks” during a January 2021 frenzy that squeezed hedge funds.
Customers who owned stocks such as AMC Entertainment (NYSE:), the former Bed Bath & Beyond (OTC:) and GameStop (NYSE:) claimed in the proposed class action that they lost money because Robinhood stopped them from buying more as social media-fueled trading drove prices skyward.
Other holders of the stocks also said they were harmed, because the restrictions eventually caused prices of their stocks to fall.
But in a 3-0 decision, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta said Robinhood’s standard customer agreement specifically authorized the restrictions, and did not suggest that Robinhood would accept all trade orders.
The court also dismissed claims that Robinhood was negligent in failing to keep investors from losing money, or failed to ensure that its “mission critical systems” would work properly.
“When Robinhood restricted its customers’ ability to buy meme stocks, it took a sizable – and perhaps justifiable – hit in the court of public opinion,” Circuit Judge Britt Grant wrote. “But in this court, Robinhood is only accountable for specific legal duties.”
Lawyers for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Robinhood and its lawyers did not immediately respond to similar requests.
Thursday’s decision upheld a November 2021 ruling by Chief Judge Cecilia Altonaga of the Miami federal court.
The meme stock frenzy has been fueled in part by investors using online forums such as Twitter and the subreddit WallStreet Bets.
It led to a “short squeeze” that caused big losses for hedge funds betting stock prices would fall, and what Robinhood called “outsized regulatory collateral calls” for the Menlo Park, California-based company and other brokers.
Robinhood is also being sued by investors who sold nine meme stocks at a loss in late January and early February 2021.
Shares of Robinhood were up 3 cents at $10.83 at midday on Thursday.
The case is In re January 2021 Short Squeeze Trading Litigation, 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 22-10669.
Read the full article here
-
Investing5 days ago
This All-Access Pass to Learning Is Now $20 for Black Friday
-
Passive Income5 days ago
How to Create a Routine That Balances Rest and Business Success
-
Side Hustles6 days ago
Apple Prepares a New AI-Powered Siri to Compete With ChatGPT
-
Side Hustles3 days ago
A Macy’s Employee Made Accounting Errors Worth $132 Million
-
Passive Income6 days ago
Customers Want More Than Just a Product — Here’s How to Keep Up
-
Investing2 days ago
Factbox-How Trump can overhaul US financial regulators when he takes office By Reuters
-
Side Hustles7 days ago
MIT Gives Free Tuition For Families Earning $200,000 or Less
-
Side Hustles5 days ago
Gift the Power of Language Learning with This Limited-Time Price on Babbel