Investing
Talc supplier hit with $29 million verdict in South Carolina trial
© Reuters.
By Brendan Pierson
(Reuters) – A South Carolina jury has ordered former talc supplier Whittaker, Clark & Daniels to pay $29.14 million to a woman who said she developed mesothelioma from being exposed to asbestos-tainted talc in cosmetic products.
The jury in Columbia on Friday also found that talc manufacturer IMI (LON:) Fabi was not responsible for plaintiff Sarah Plant’s illness, clearing it of liability, according to Jessica Dean, a lawyer for the plaintiff.
Cosmetics company Mary Kay and makeup pigment maker Color Techniques were also defendants but were dropped mid-trial after reaching confidential agreements with Plant. The trial was the first over talc claims against Mary Kay, according to Dean.
She said the verdict against Whittaker was just but that she wished the case could have been resolved before trial.
“I just hope we can figure out a better way than having juries resolve (cases) every time,” she said. “It’s truly horrible for our clients who don’t have time.”
A lawyer for Whittaker declined to comment, and Italy-based IMI Fabi did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Whittaker is no longer in business, and its corporate successor is a U.S. arm of Germany-based chemical company Brenntag SE, according to court records.
Plant, now 36, sued the companies last year. She said she developed mesothelioma, a deadly cancer, at age 35 after using a variety of talc products since early childhood that contained asbestos.
Leading talc product maker Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:) had also been a defendant in the case but was not part of the trial because it transferred its talc liabilities to a subsidiary that it placed in bankruptcy. The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in January rejected that bankruptcy strategy, and Dean said she hoped Plant would have a chance to take the company to trial as well.
Whittaker, Clark & Daniels last year won a reversal of a $16 million verdict in a similar cosmetic talc case against it in New York.
The case is Plant v. Avon Products Inc (NYSE:)., et al., South Carolina Court of Common Pleas in Richland County, No. 2022CP4001265.
For Plant: Jessica Dean of Dean Omar Branham Shirley
For Whittaker: Stephanie Flynn of Fox Rothschild
For IMI Fabi: Elizabeth O’Neill of Womble Bond Dickinson
Read more:
N.Y. high court overturns $16.5 million asbestos verdict
U.S. court rejects J&J bankruptcy strategy for thousands of talc lawsuits
Read the full article here
-
Side Hustles5 days ago
How to Create a Unique Value Proposition (With Tips & Examples)
-
Side Hustles5 days ago
The DOJ Reportedly Wants Google to Sell Its Chrome Browser
-
Investing4 days ago
Are You Missing These Hidden Warning Signs When Hiring?
-
Make Money4 days ago
7 Common Things You Should Never Buy New
-
Investing6 days ago
This Founder Turned a Hangover Cure into Millions
-
Investing1 day ago
This All-Access Pass to Learning Is Now $20 for Black Friday
-
Passive Income1 day ago
How to Create a Routine That Balances Rest and Business Success
-
Investing4 days ago
Google faces call from DuckDuckGo for new EU probes into tech rule compliance By Reuters